Here are some plots of weather conditions over the past day.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b15c5/b15c5dfe122568ccd6f1b1f2a4a11ad989ab7889" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b958/5b95873a3f7bcc6460e125eb480533b8619f9db8" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b245/4b245161fdcb9cc9a64ec4b246ebd898b1044511" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2543/a254338d3df26f7e95278d719a5e9b29de5279f9" alt=""
The rain began around the start of my rehearsal at 1900, right in the middle of these plots. The shifts in temperature, wind and humidity are substantial on these scales. The pressure, which seems like a natural candidate to impact acoustics, doesn't change all that much, going from 100 to 100.5 kPa, a 0.5% shift. The humidity, on the other hand, changed from 20% to 70%, which is more than a factor of 3. So is it the humidity? Dunno. It's not obvious to me how that would work. After all, the reed gets fully saturated with water when it's soaked, so why would a slight shift in external humidity change its shape or properties? Or would it be due to the humidity in the air column of the instrument bore? That air is all exhaled breath, which I'd think is generally saturated with water vapor regardless of the external humidity. Curious.
I still don't believe it. Nope.
ReplyDelete